ูุฑูุฏ ๐ต๐ธ๐๐ป on farid.ps
Displacement for Faith: Those who are displaced or suffer for their faith are promised divine support and reward.
Martyrdom: Martyrs are assured of a special status in Paradise, where they are described as being "alive with their Lord" and receiving bounties.
Levels in Paradise: The idea of different levels or degrees in heaven suggests that one's proximity to Allah is based on their deeds, faith, and spiritual purity. The "Foremost" are those who are nearest to Allah, enjoying the highest rewards.
Divine Justice and Reward: Both texts assure believers of a just recompense for their faith and sacrifices. The Quranic concept of levels in Paradise mirrors the Christian idea of varying degrees of closeness to God or rewards, though expressed differently. The New Jerusalem's promise of eternal peace can be seen as the ultimate level where all believers are in the closest communion with God, transcending even the highest Islamic Paradise levels.
Spiritual Proximity: The Quranic idea of being closer or further from Allah in Paradise parallels the Christian hope of the Beatific Vision, where believers see God "face to face." In both traditions, the ultimate reward involves a profound spiritual intimacy with the Divine.
Motivation for Righteousness: The promise of different levels in Paradise or the vision of New Jerusalem encourages believers to live righteously. The Quranic narrative might focus on individual spiritual merit, while Revelation speaks to a collective redemption and renewal, but both emphasize the importance of one's life choices.
Hope in Suffering: For those who suffer or are displaced because of their faith, both scriptures offer hope. The Quran speaks of divine protection and reward here and in the afterlife, while Revelation promises a new world where all such suffering is nullified, where "God himself will be with them and be their God."
Eschatological Fulfillment: The Quranic levels in Paradise can be seen as stages of spiritual elevation, while the New Jerusalem symbolizes the final, universal stage where all believers are united in God's presence, transcending all previous distinctions of reward or level.
ููุฏ ูุงู ุงูุดููุฏ ูุฑุงูุจ ุจููุธุฉ ุงููุฌูู ุนูู ู ุนุณูุฑ ุงูุฃูููุงุกุ ุนูู ุงููุงุณ ุงูุฐูู ุฃุญุจูู ุ ูููู ู ู ู ูุธูุฑ 13.7 ู ููุงุฑ ุณูุฉุ ูุฅู 15 ุดูุฑูุง ููุท ุจุฏุช ูู ุบูุฑ ู ูู ุฉ. ููู ุง ูููู ุงููุฑุขูุ ูู ุนุงูุจ ุงููู ุงููุงุณ ุนูู ุฐููุจูู ุนูู ุงูููุฑุ ูู ุง ุจูู ุนูู ุงูุฃุฑุถ ุญูุงุฉ. ุจู ุฅูู ูู ูุญูู ู ููุฉ ุฅูู ููุช ู ุญุฏุฏุ ููุถู ู ุฃู ุงูุญุณุงุจ ุณูุฃุชู ุญุชู ุงู ูุฏูููุงูุ ูุง ูุชุฃุฎุฑ ููุง ูุนุฌู. ููุฐุง ูุฏู ุนูู ุตุจุฑ ุงููู ูุนุธู ุฉ ุฎุทุชู.
As-Shaheed, the Witness, has been vigilantly observing the attack on the camp of the saints, on the people that he loves, but with a perspective spanning 13.7 billion years, a mere 15 months seems insignificant to Him. As stated in the Quran, if Allah were to punish people immediately for their transgressions, no life would remain on earth. Instead, He grants them respite until a predetermined time, ensuring that when judgment arrives, it is inevitable and precise, neither delayed nor hastened. This illustrates the divine patience and the grand scale of Allah's plan.
The document highlighted in this X post provides a significant missing link in the discourse surrounding Israel's actions in Gaza by suggesting an intention that could be interpreted as genocidal. Hereโs a summary focusing on this aspect:
Explicit Demand for Destruction: The letter signed by eight members of the Israeli Knesset, as shown in the document and its translation, explicitly calls for the destruction of essential resources like energy, food, and water in Gaza. This demand, when viewed through the lens of international law, particularly the Genocide Convention, which defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, suggests a deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the Palestinian population in Gaza.
Legal and Scholarly Analysis: The document references legal analysis and scholarly perspectives, indicating that the actions proposed align with the criteria for genocide. Scholars and legal experts have pointed out that such systematic destruction of resources essential for survival could be seen as inflicting conditions of life aimed at the destruction of a group, fulfilling one of the genocidal acts listed in international law. This analysis links the practical actions proposed by Israeli officials to the legal definitions of genocide, providing a framework to understand these actions as potentially genocidal.
Public Statements and Intent: By mentioning public statements from high-ranking Israeli officials, the document underscores the intent behind these policies. Intent is a critical element in proving genocide, and the letter's content, along with the officials' public declarations, could be interpreted as evidence of a specific intent to destroy the Palestinian population in Gaza, as these statements often dehumanize the population or suggest a collective punishment approach.
Contextual Evidence: The document's discussion of the broader political context, including the involvement of members from right-wing parties known for their hardline stances on security issues, situates these actions within a political framework that might support more extreme measures against Gaza. The political alignment of the signatories, their roles in the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and the historical context of the conflict provide additional layers of evidence that this intent might be state-sanctioned or at least widely supported within certain political circles in Israel.
In summary, this document serves as a critical piece of evidence that connects Israel's proposed actions in Gaza to the intent to commit genocide by detailing a strategy that systematically deprives the population of basic necessities for survival, backed by legal and scholarly analysis, and supported by public statements that could indicate genocidal intent. This analysis helps in framing the discussion not just around the humanitarian impact of these actions but also within the legal framework of genocide, highlighting a potential intention to destroy a significant part of the Palestinian population in Gaza.
API Exploitation and Investment: These bots likely leverage X's API, either through costly legitimate access or unauthorized means, indicating significant resource investment. Their rapid interaction with posts suggests sophisticated operations, potentially aimed at broader manipulation.
Algorithmic Manipulation: By liking posts instantly, these bots trigger X's algorithms to flag content as spam, reducing visibility. This could serve dual purposes: manipulating visibility and indirectly targeting specific groups.
Creating a Hostile Environment: The bots might be designed to disproportionately target or appear to target Arabs/Muslims, who might have cultural or religious objections to pornography. Even though the linked websites are defunct, the initial impression from the profile and links might still provoke discomfort or offense, contributing to a hostile online environment.
Cultural Misinformation: If these accounts are perceived as associated with Arab or Muslim communities due to the nature of the imagery or the implication of the links, it can perpetuate stereotypes or misinformation, fostering an environment of hostility or misunderstanding.
Policy Enforcement Gaps: X's response to user reports often denies policy violations by these bots, despite their deceptive practices. This raises questions about policy clarity and application, especially in cases where cultural sensitivities might be at play.
User Impact: The visibility of user content is compromised, but there's also the potential for targeted harassment or the creation of a negative online experience for specific groups. This situation underscores the need for X to refine its algorithms to distinguish between genuine and manipulated content, considering cultural contexts.
Broader Implications: Beyond simple spam, this scenario could be part of a strategy to manipulate perceptions, inflame cultural divides, or even serve political agendas by creating friction. It highlights the need for platforms to be vigilant about content that might not just spam but also manipulate social dynamics.
Need for Policy and Algorithmic Evolution: There's a clear need for policy reassessment to address not only spam but also the cultural impact of content. Algorithms should be sensitive to how content might be perceived by different cultural groups, ensuring they don't inadvertently amplify hostility. Community involvement and industry collaboration are crucial to address these multifaceted threats to digital trust, integrity, and social harmony.
API Exploitation and Investment: These bots likely leverage X's API, either through costly legitimate access or unauthorized means, indicating significant resource investment aimed at algorithmic manipulation. Their rapid interaction with posts suggests sophisticated operations.
Algorithmic Manipulation: By liking posts instantly, these bots trigger X's algorithms to flag content as spam, reducing its visibility. This manipulation highlights flaws in spam detection, where the system inadvertently penalizes legitimate content.
Policy Enforcement Gaps: X's response to user reports often denies policy violations by these bots, despite their deceptive practices. This discrepancy questions the clarity and application of X's policies, suggesting inadequate resource allocation or policy thresholds for action.
User Impact: The visibility of user content is severely compromised, impacting personal and professional online engagement. This situation underscores the need for X to refine its algorithms to distinguish between genuine and manipulated content.
Broader Implications: The scenario illustrates the challenge of maintaining platform integrity against economic-driven manipulation. It calls for more transparency from platforms on how they detect and mitigate such activities, alongside user empowerment to counteract these effects.
Need for Policy and Algorithmic Evolution: There's a clear need for policy reassessment and improved algorithms that do not inadvertently become tools for content suppression. Community involvement and possibly industry collaboration are necessary to address these threats to digital trust and integrity.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you have the right to stop answering at any time.
Some people say they are born to the wrong body, I say I am born to the wrong country.
Grok: It's fascinating how you've expressed feeling like you were born in the wrong country, which parallels the sentiment some people have about being born in the wrong body. This feeling of displacement or mismatch with one's environment is a profound one, touching on themes of identity, belonging, and cultural fit. Here are a few thoughts on this:
Identity and Belonging: Just as gender identity can be at odds with one's physical body, national or cultural identity can feel misaligned with one's birthplace. This can lead to a deep sense of not belonging, which resonates with concepts like cultural identity discussed in sources like the Cambridge Dictionary entry on cultural identity.
Psychological Impact: Feeling born into the wrong country can lead to similar psychological effects as feeling born into the wrong body, including an identity crisis. According to Erik Erikson's theory, this could be part of a broader identity cohesion vs. role confusion stage, where individuals struggle with integrating their self-image with societal expectations, possibly leading to feelings of alienation or confusion.
Migration and Adaptation: Many who feel this way might choose to move or migrate, seeking a place where they feel more at home. However, as discussed in various sources, this transition isn't always smooth. The process of moving abroad can lead to depression or the "moving abroad blues," highlighting the challenges of acclimating to new cultural environments and the loss of connection to one's roots.
Cultural Strategies: For those who travel or migrate due to this feeling, cultural strategies can help in finding a sense of 'home' away from their birthplace. This includes engaging with communities or activities that resonate with one's identity, which can be a way to mitigate feelings of displacement.
Your sentiment is a poignant reminder of how identity transcends physical location, emphasizing the need for environments that nurture our true selves, whether that's related to gender, nationality, or cultural identity. It's a journey of self-discovery and acceptance, regardless of the specific form it takes.
With tears, Fadi says, "I wish to die a thousand times a minute from the intensity of the pain."
The world unfortunately forgot about him. https://x.com/Abu_Salah9/status/1876317741151604977
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Nazi Persecution: During the Nazi era, the term "Gypsy" was indeed used in a highly derogatory manner. The Nazis persecuted the Romani people, much like they did the Jewish population, under racial purity laws, leading to the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Romani in the Holocaust (Porajmos). This period of intense persecution and dehumanization under Nazi rule certainly contributed to the term's negative connotations.
